To be absolutely clear: I didn't see this movie. I'm not *going* to see this movie. I'm not really reviewing it, I'm just noting how philosophically horrific this movie is.
The basic premise seems to be that humans are "destroying" the earth and thus some super-powerful aliens have decided to get rid of humanity in order to "save" the earth. What are we doing that's so bad? Technology.
Now, here's where it just gets STUPID. How the hell did these aliens get the power to destroy us WITHOUT technology? We're being attacked by super-powerful HYPOCRITES? Wow, that's inspirational.
In addition to this spectacular bit of idiocy, the trailers gave some evidence that a Jesus-like sacrifice will be required on the part of the female protagonist in order to prevent this catastrophe. (I don't know if this actually happens or not.)
If you are confronted by presumptuous hypocritical aliens demanding sacrifices, do yourself (and, by extension, the rest of us) a favor and tell them to go to hell--which is the only rational and appropriate response. Like Anton Chigurh from No Country for Old Men, don't give someone holding you hostage the excuse of pretending that it's *your* fault that they are killing *you*. They don't even deserve *that* much concession.
Book reviews, art, gaming, Objectivism and thoughts on other topics as they occur.
About Me
Dec 18, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
►
2020
(4)
- ► November 2020 (1)
- ► October 2020 (1)
- ► February 2020 (1)
-
►
2019
(33)
- ► December 2019 (1)
- ► November 2019 (1)
- ► October 2019 (2)
- ► September 2019 (5)
- ► August 2019 (8)
- ► March 2019 (1)
-
►
2018
(4)
- ► December 2018 (1)
- ► October 2018 (1)
- ► February 2018 (2)
-
►
2016
(3)
- ► March 2016 (1)
- ► February 2016 (2)
-
►
2014
(26)
- ► April 2014 (3)
- ► March 2014 (2)
- ► February 2014 (3)
- ► January 2014 (7)
-
►
2013
(84)
- ► December 2013 (2)
- ► November 2013 (2)
- ► October 2013 (10)
- ► September 2013 (26)
- ► August 2013 (10)
- ► April 2013 (1)
- ► March 2013 (4)
- ► February 2013 (5)
- ► January 2013 (7)
-
►
2012
(26)
- ► December 2012 (7)
- ► November 2012 (6)
- ► April 2012 (3)
- ► January 2012 (2)
-
►
2011
(26)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (8)
- ► August 2011 (3)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► February 2011 (1)
-
►
2010
(2)
- ► November 2010 (1)
- ► September 2010 (1)
-
►
2009
(92)
- ► November 2009 (2)
- ► October 2009 (3)
- ► September 2009 (1)
- ► August 2009 (13)
- ► April 2009 (13)
- ► March 2009 (5)
- ► February 2009 (2)
- ► January 2009 (1)
-
▼
2008
(71)
- ► November 2008 (5)
- ► October 2008 (4)
- ► September 2008 (6)
- ► August 2008 (12)
- ► April 2008 (14)
- ► March 2008 (4)
- ► February 2008 (4)
- ► January 2008 (9)
-
►
2007
(107)
- ► December 2007 (18)
- ► November 2007 (6)
- ► October 2007 (8)
- ► September 2007 (14)
- ► August 2007 (9)
- ► April 2007 (1)
- ► March 2007 (1)
- ► February 2007 (1)
- ► January 2007 (11)
-
►
2006
(177)
- ► December 2006 (3)
- ► October 2006 (1)
- ► September 2006 (4)
- ► August 2006 (8)
- ► April 2006 (17)
- ► March 2006 (32)
- ► February 2006 (35)
- ► January 2006 (30)
-
►
2005
(46)
- ► December 2005 (26)
- ► November 2005 (20)
4 comments:
I've been watching many movies lately, paying special attention to their underlying philosophies. While I can and do enjoy many philosophically imperfect movies if they have redeeming aspects, some are really depraved.
Recently, I saw Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind by Hayao Miyazaki. It was recommended on the ObjectivismOnline forums, but I could not get over the heroine's blatant pacifism and environmentalism which seemed to be the focus of the movie. When she killed *her father's murderers* in a bout of rage, she cried and regret what she had done. Later, when her kidnappers were being killed for reasons she did not know, she cried for it to stop and stood in front of the guns to end it. Then, of course, the basic message of the movie seemed to be that insects and nature should be respected like any human (or more so). Ugh! I'll stick to Spirited Away.
If I see "The Day the Earth Stood Still," should someone invite me to do so, I'll fill you in on how it actually plays out. But I don't plan on it.
Thanks for the post! I enjoy your movie commentary.
-Brandon
Stick with the original. It actually had a decent message given what we're used to seeing on the big screen.
Hi. I'm doing sort of the same thing over at The Nearby Pen--that is, reviewing books and movies (from an Objectivist perspective). Hope you'll stop by if you have the time...
It's not surprising that the message was changed for the modern audience. I saw the original with Patricia Neal, who interestingly played Dominique in the film version of "The Fountainhead", and Michael Rennie (as Klaatu) and Sam Jaffe (as the peaceful scientist modeled after Einstein).
The message for the original was quite different. Humanity was threatened with extinction by a conglomerate of races who had agreed to equip a police force with absolute authority in the event of aggression, and our coming of age atomically and in terms of space flight put us on the watch list.
Even as a young child I saw this for what it was. I put it to anyone that a movie made presenting the equivalent attitude by the US towards say, Trobrianders or any other society so primitive as to believe us omnipotent, would be rejected out of hand as exhibiting classical imperialism.
As SF, it should have been the first of a trilogy, with Part II presenting our emergence as a space-faring race who could not be cowed by the all-powerful Gorts.
Post a Comment