So, for my birthday yesterday I finally got around to watching The Incredibles 2. Normally, I would have watched it a lot sooner, or even gone to see it in the theater because I generally love Pixar movies. One of the things that I usually love about Pixar movies is that they are almost never about what I think they're going to be about. This one was no exception.
The reason why I didn't bother to see this one in the theater is that I saw a lot of mixed reactions claiming that the movie was "a mess" or "just dumb action" or "incoherent". No one seemed capable of identifying a central premise or theme for the movie, and a lot of people seemed disappointed.
Well, boy, did they ever miss the boat. This movie is just as tight as The Incredibles, and, in fact, it even forms a perfect symmetry with the first movie, illustrating both halves of a false dichotomy and maintaining a consistent theme between both movies, showing what is ultimately the same theme from different angles. This is an incredibly rare, almost unheard-of thing for a sequel to do. Heck, nowadays it's pretty rare for a single, stand-alone movie to have a coherent, identifiable theme that's more complex than "defeat the bad guys".
So, what is the theme? Why did everyone think that the movie is "a mess" or "incoherent"?
The theme of BOTH movies, articulated, is, "supers are just people". That's it. So simple. Everything in BOTH movies adds up to this, but taken from different angles.
In The Incredibles, superpowers are largely viewed as a bad thing, even shameful, that has to be hidden. The movie follows a family of superheroes who are in hiding. They can't be themselves, and they're struggling, depressed, and unhappy because of it. But, if you look closer, at the type of problems they have, they are just people problems. Job dissatisfaction. Trying to keep your family functioning when they're all pulling different directions. Growing up. Dating. Family squabbles. These are all regular-people problems. Heck, even when the villain is attacking the city with giant robots, the regular-people problems still take center stage.
In The Incredibles 2, it's the same overall theme, just a new set of problems and a new villain. The villain, while an emergency situation that does need to be dealt with, is not the centerpiece of the movie. The family stuff is the center of the movie. The personal problems. The stuff of daily life.
This is the inverse of your typical superhero movie, in which the point is, ultimately, always to rise to the challenge of defeating the villain, often at the cost of throwing aside or even rejecting daily life. It's interesting that in most superhero stories, this manages to (somehow) conveniently wrap up the daily life issues. Would that work in real life? Not so much. "Dropping everything" to go haring off on a mad adventure doesn't pay the bills, and there isn't usually a nice pot of gold at the end of the rainbow to conveniently solve all of your problems. In the universe of The Incredibles, the real challenge is to confront and surmount the difficulties of daily life. Only when this is accomplished can the family come together (with friends and allies) to defeat the villain.
The villains in both movies are examples of rejecting the idea that supers are just people. Both villains commit atrocities trying to one-up supers: Syndrome because he wants to drag supers down, Screenslaver because she thinks that supers are HOLDING everyone ELSE down. Both of these views are wrong, in the same way and for the same reason. Supers are just people.
What ultimately makes you a hero or a villain isn't the power you happen to have. It's the choices you make.
Book reviews, art, gaming, Objectivism and thoughts on other topics as they occur.
About Me
Oct 27, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
►
2020
(4)
- ► November 2020 (1)
- ► October 2020 (1)
- ► February 2020 (1)
-
►
2019
(33)
- ► December 2019 (1)
- ► November 2019 (1)
- ► October 2019 (2)
- ► September 2019 (5)
- ► August 2019 (8)
- ► March 2019 (1)
-
▼
2018
(4)
- ► December 2018 (1)
- ► February 2018 (2)
-
►
2016
(3)
- ► March 2016 (1)
- ► February 2016 (2)
-
►
2014
(26)
- ► April 2014 (3)
- ► March 2014 (2)
- ► February 2014 (3)
- ► January 2014 (7)
-
►
2013
(84)
- ► December 2013 (2)
- ► November 2013 (2)
- ► October 2013 (10)
- ► September 2013 (26)
- ► August 2013 (10)
- ► April 2013 (1)
- ► March 2013 (4)
- ► February 2013 (5)
- ► January 2013 (7)
-
►
2012
(26)
- ► December 2012 (7)
- ► November 2012 (6)
- ► April 2012 (3)
- ► January 2012 (2)
-
►
2011
(26)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (8)
- ► August 2011 (3)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► February 2011 (1)
-
►
2010
(2)
- ► November 2010 (1)
- ► September 2010 (1)
-
►
2009
(92)
- ► November 2009 (2)
- ► October 2009 (3)
- ► September 2009 (1)
- ► August 2009 (13)
- ► April 2009 (13)
- ► March 2009 (5)
- ► February 2009 (2)
- ► January 2009 (1)
-
►
2008
(71)
- ► December 2008 (1)
- ► November 2008 (5)
- ► October 2008 (4)
- ► September 2008 (6)
- ► August 2008 (12)
- ► April 2008 (14)
- ► March 2008 (4)
- ► February 2008 (4)
- ► January 2008 (9)
-
►
2007
(107)
- ► December 2007 (18)
- ► November 2007 (6)
- ► October 2007 (8)
- ► September 2007 (14)
- ► August 2007 (9)
- ► April 2007 (1)
- ► March 2007 (1)
- ► February 2007 (1)
- ► January 2007 (11)
-
►
2006
(177)
- ► December 2006 (3)
- ► October 2006 (1)
- ► September 2006 (4)
- ► August 2006 (8)
- ► April 2006 (17)
- ► March 2006 (32)
- ► February 2006 (35)
- ► January 2006 (30)
-
►
2005
(46)
- ► December 2005 (26)
- ► November 2005 (20)
1 comment:
Yup. I think you nailed it. Watching a "super" dad attempt to single parent brings home your point and was hilarious.
Post a Comment