Just to clarify: the title of this post is the first book in a trilogy. I linked to a boxed set for the trilogy. I've only read the first two books in the trilogy.
I'm not really sure whether I have any interest in reading further: the bookstore that is actually near my house doesn't have the third book by itself and my overall impression of the two preceding novels is that they are really, incredibly . . . girly.
You heard me: girly.
Now I appreciate that this is not actually a bad quality if you are, in fact, a girl. And Elizabeth Haydon appears to be a pretty good writer in a more general sense: the books are interesting and once I started I read them all the way through without getting bored or fed up. But CRIMINY woman your CHARACTERS ARE SO CLICHED. Could your heroine be any more like the stereotypical good girl from any given fairy tale? Can we stop with the loving children and forest animals thing? Please?
Ms. Haydon left me with a truly mixed perception of her novels on pretty much all levels. Okay, we have the stereotypical characters. But she appears to realize this fact and does some interesting things to correct it, like having other characters complain that the heroine is acting in a stereotypically "female" manner. It's almost like she wrote the book, realized it was terribly hacky, and then went back and fixed all the worst moments . . . almost, in fact, like a case study in what happens when a Naturalist writes using archetypical characters. I don't quite know how to describe it, because I don't think I've encountered quite this same phenomenon before.
The plot is certainly surreal enough on its own. The first novel starts out with an assassin and a giant that is also a military sergeant (there is never any explanation given for why these two are hanging around together, it's just one of those weird fantasy crossover things) escaping from the Evil Force of Doom (something like that). They meet: a bard. She's an ex-prostitute on the run from an obsessed client, btw. It's like Pick Your Former Profession Out of a Hat characterization or something. So, due to a fundamentally bizarre coincidence, the assassin and giant duo kidnap said cute bardic female ex prostitute.
They end up climbing down the roots of the World Tree for LITERALLY CENTURIES and emerging in a new land, which is good because they old land they left has been destroyed while they were doing their Journey to the Center of the Earth thing. How does this make any sense?! I think it Seemed Like A Good Idea at the Time. They find a Really Cool Magic Bard Sword. Oh, and by the way it's really nice that here they are in the Future now because it turns out the reason that our bard nee prostitute Rhapsody (the title character of the first book, go figure), was actually in love with this guy that travelled back in time from the New Land and just incidentally claimed her virtue and then vanished, leaving her bereft. Hence why she descended into a life of sin.
Help me. I tell you, the really surprising thing about these books is the fact that they're actually readable.
Rating: 2.5
Book reviews, art, gaming, Objectivism and thoughts on other topics as they occur.
About Me
Jul 26, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
►
2020
(4)
- ► November 2020 (1)
- ► October 2020 (1)
- ► February 2020 (1)
-
►
2019
(33)
- ► December 2019 (1)
- ► November 2019 (1)
- ► October 2019 (2)
- ► September 2019 (5)
- ► August 2019 (8)
- ► March 2019 (1)
-
►
2018
(4)
- ► December 2018 (1)
- ► October 2018 (1)
- ► February 2018 (2)
-
►
2016
(3)
- ► March 2016 (1)
- ► February 2016 (2)
-
►
2014
(26)
- ► April 2014 (3)
- ► March 2014 (2)
- ► February 2014 (3)
- ► January 2014 (7)
-
►
2013
(84)
- ► December 2013 (2)
- ► November 2013 (2)
- ► October 2013 (10)
- ► September 2013 (26)
- ► August 2013 (10)
- ► April 2013 (1)
- ► March 2013 (4)
- ► February 2013 (5)
- ► January 2013 (7)
-
►
2012
(26)
- ► December 2012 (7)
- ► November 2012 (6)
- ► April 2012 (3)
- ► January 2012 (2)
-
►
2011
(26)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (8)
- ► August 2011 (3)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► February 2011 (1)
-
►
2010
(2)
- ► November 2010 (1)
- ► September 2010 (1)
-
►
2009
(92)
- ► November 2009 (2)
- ► October 2009 (3)
- ► September 2009 (1)
- ► August 2009 (13)
- ► April 2009 (13)
- ► March 2009 (5)
- ► February 2009 (2)
- ► January 2009 (1)
-
►
2008
(71)
- ► December 2008 (1)
- ► November 2008 (5)
- ► October 2008 (4)
- ► September 2008 (6)
- ► August 2008 (12)
- ► April 2008 (14)
- ► March 2008 (4)
- ► February 2008 (4)
- ► January 2008 (9)
-
▼
2007
(107)
- ► December 2007 (18)
- ► November 2007 (6)
- ► October 2007 (8)
- ► September 2007 (14)
- ► August 2007 (9)
-
▼
July 2007
(30)
- Government vs. Diabetics
- Rhapsody
- It's Official, I'm a Webcomic Junkie
- Feature Changeup
- A Nameless Witch
- New Feature, Maybe?
- Thank You, J.K. Rowling
- Live Free or Die Hard
- They're Ruining my Reputation
- Treasure Tables
- Would You Have Survived in the Middle Ages?
- More Comics
- Military Science Fiction/Fantasy Tropes
- Class Dis-Mythed
- Myth-taken Identity
- Here Kitty, Kitty
- Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
- Shrek the Third
- The Anvil of the World
- Pirates of the Carribean: At World's End
- Jennifer Government
- Ratatouille
- A Song of Ice and Fire
- Transformers
- Soon I Will Be Invincible
- Dragon Bones
- Paladins
- Public Decency and Nuisance Laws
- Blogroll Update
- Check Out My New Ride
- ► April 2007 (1)
- ► March 2007 (1)
- ► February 2007 (1)
- ► January 2007 (11)
-
►
2006
(177)
- ► December 2006 (3)
- ► October 2006 (1)
- ► September 2006 (4)
- ► August 2006 (8)
- ► April 2006 (17)
- ► March 2006 (32)
- ► February 2006 (35)
- ► January 2006 (30)
-
►
2005
(46)
- ► December 2005 (26)
- ► November 2005 (20)
1 comment:
"Can we stop with the loving children and forest animals thing? Please?"
I laughed.
When I see reviews like this, it gives me hope. If Haydon can get by with this drek, then surely some publisher somewhere can make room for me.
Post a Comment